Chapter 10B: Limit Theorems  
MATH/STAT 394: Probability I  
Arman Jahangiri  
University of Washington Department of Mathematics  
Summer 2026  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026  
1
 
Learning Goals  
By the end of this lecture, students should be able to:  
understand the Law of Large Numbers;  
distinguish convergence in probability from exact equality;  
apply the Weak Law of Large Numbers;  
understand Monte Carlo integration;  
define the empirical CDF;  
understand the Central Limit Theorem;  
standardize sums and averages;  
apply Normal approximations to Binomial and Poisson distributions.  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026  
2
Why Limit Theorems Matter  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026  
3
Order Emerging from Randomness  
Individual random outcomes are unpredictable.  
But large collections of random variables often display remarkable regularity.  
Examples:  
sample averages stabilize;  
proportions settle down;  
histograms become bell-shaped;  
randomness averages out.  
Main message  
Large-scale randomness becomes highly structured.  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026  
4
Two Fundamental Theorems  
The two most important limit theorems are:  
1
Law of Large Numbers (LLN)  
averages converge to expectations;  
2
Central Limit Theorem (CLT)  
normalized sums become approximately Normal.  
Together, these form the foundation of modern statistics.  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026  
5
Law of Large Numbers (LLN)  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026  
6
Weak Law of Large Numbers  
Theorem (WLLN)  
Let X1, X2, . . . be i.i.d. random variables with finite mean µ (and finite variance σ2)  
Then  
¯
¯
ε > 0,  
lim P |Xn µ| > ε = 0, or equivalently,  
lim P |Xn µ| ≤ ε = 1.  
n→∞  
n→∞  
Interpretation  
¯
As the sample size grows, the sample mean Xn becomes arbitrarily close to the population mean µ with  
probability approaching 1.  
Notation (Convergence in Probability): This phenomena is also known as convergence in probability, and is  
denoted by  
P
¯
Xn µ.  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026  
7
Proof of WLLN Using Chebyshev’s Inequality  
Recall:  
¯
E(Xn) = µ,  
and  
σ2  
¯
Var(Xn) =  
.
n
Applying Chebyshev:  
¯
Var(Xn)  
¯
P(|Xn µ| > ε) ≤  
.
ε2  
Thus:  
σ2  
nε2  
¯
P(|Xn µ| > ε) ≤  
.
As  
n → ∞,  
the right-hand side goes to  
0.  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026  
8
Coin Toss Example  
Suppose:  
(
1, Heads,  
Xi =  
0, Tails.  
Then E(Xi ) = p. The sample mean is:  
n
X
1
¯
Xn =  
Xi = proportion of Heads.  
n
i=1  
P
The LLN says Xn p. Thus, observed proportions stabilize near the true probability p.  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026  
9
LLN’s Connection to Relative Frequency (Probability’s Naive Definition)  
The coin toss example in the previous slide gives a mathematical justification for the frequency interpretation  
of probability (naive probability) introduced earlier in the course.  
Let A ⊆ S be an event. Define the indicator random variables  
(
1, if A occurs on trial i,  
Xi =  
0, otherwise.  
Then Xi Bernoulli(P(A)), so E(Xi ) = P(A). The sample mean becomes  
n
X
1
#{times A occurs in n trials}  
¯
Xn =  
Xi =  
,
n
n
i=1  
which is the relative frequency of the event A (exactly what we previously defined as (naive) definition of  
probability). Hence, by the LLN,  
P
Xn P(A) ,  
or less formally put,  
P
naive definition of probability −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−Axiomatic Definition of Probability  
number of times we repeat the experiment→∞  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026 10  
Strong Law of Large Numbers  
Strong Law  
Under the same assumptions of WLLN, we have  
¯
P( lim Xn = µ) = 1.  
n→∞  
Equivalently,  
P({s ∈ S : lim X(s) = µ}) = 1  
n→∞  
Notation (Almost-Sure Convergence): This phenomenon is also known as almost-sure convergence or  
almost-everywhere convergence, and is denoted by  
a.s.  
a.e.  
¯
¯
Xn −→ µ, or Xn −→ µ  
Remark: Almost-sure convergence implies (i.e., is stronger than) convergence in probability. Thus, SLLN is  
stronger than WLLN. The proof requires graduate-level background of Probability (Borel-Canteli Lemma).  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026 11  
LLN Application: Monte Carlo Integration  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026 12  
Monte Carlo Integration  
Suppose we want to compute  
Z
1
g(x) dx.  
0
i.i.d.  
Let U1, . . . , Un Unif(0, 1).  
Then  
Z
1
E(g(Ui )) =  
g(x) dx.  
0
Hence,  
Z
n
X
1
1
E[  
g(Uj )] =  
g(x) dx.  
n
0
j=1  
By the WLLN,  
Z
Z
n
X
1
n
1
1
X
1
P
g(Uj ) →  
g(x) dx, and thus,  
g(Uj ) ≈  
g(x) dx for large n.  
n
n
0
0
j=1  
j=1  
This is called Monte Carlo estimation of integrals. Draw n random points on the interval, evaluate the function g  
on them, and then average. The larger the n the closer the average to the true integral.  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026 13  
LLN Application: Empirical Distribution Function  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026 14  
Empirical CDF  
Given observations:  
X1, . . . , Xn F  
define the empirical CDF:  
n
X
1
ˆ
Fn(x) =  
I(Xj x).  
n
j=1  
Interpretation:  
ˆ
Fn(x) = fraction of observations x.  
For fixed x, the indicators I(Xj x) are i.i.d. Bernoulli random variables with mean F(x) = P(X x). Thus, by  
the LLN:  
ˆ
Fn(x) F(x).  
The empirical CDF approximates the true CDF.  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026 15  
Central Limit Theorem  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026 16  
Central Limit Theorem  
Theorem (CLT)  
Let X1, X2, . . . be i.i.d. random variables with E(Xi ) = µ and Var(Xi ) = σ2 < .  
Then for every z R,  
¯
(Xn µ)  
z R, lim P  
n→∞  
z = Φ(z),  
σ/  
n
Interpretation  
We previously learned that E[Xn] = µ and Var[Xn] = 2 , which means that the fraction  
¯
X
µ  
is the  
n
σ
n
n
¯
¯
σ/  
¯
¯
standardized version of Xn. CLT says that for large n, the sample mean Xn is approximately normal:  
2
σ
¯
Xn N µ,  
. This is especially important because we do not assume any distribution for X1, . . . Xn yet  
n
the sample mean follows a normal distribution for large n. This offers that Normality emerges universally  
from averaging.  
Notation (Convergence in Distribution): This phenomenon is also known as convergence in distribution, and is  
¯
d
X
σ/  
µ  
n
denoted by  
N(0, 1).  
n
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026 17  
CLT Application: Normal’s Approximation to Binomial  
We have previously seen that a binomial r.v. can be written as a sum of n i.i.d. Bernouli r.v.s. Let X Bin(n, p).,  
and X = X1 + · · · + Xn, where X1, . . . , Xn Ber(p).  
Since:  
µ = E[Xi ] = p,  
σ2 = Var[Xi ] = p(1 p),  
the CLT gives:  
¯
¯
Xn E[Xn]  
X/n p  
X np  
p
p
=
=
N(0, 1).  
¯
Var[Xn]  
p(1 p)/n  
np(1 p)  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026 18  
Continuity Correction  
A subtle point here is that Binomial distributions are discrete, while Normal distributions are continuous.  
A better approximation uses a continuity correction:  
1
2
P(X k) P Y k +  
,
where  
Y N(np, np(1 p)).  
Idea  
The correction accounts for the width of discrete bins.  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026 19  
Poisson to Normal  
Suppose:  
For large  
X Pois(λ).  
λ,  
X λ  
N(0, 1).  
λ
Equivalently:  
X N(λ, λ).  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026 20  
Why the CLT Is Remarkable  
The original distribution can be:  
discrete;  
continuous;  
skewed;  
highly non-Normal.  
Yet averages still become approximately Normal.  
Universality  
The CLT explains why Normal distributions appear everywhere.  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026 21  
Summary  
The LLN says averages stabilize.  
Monte Carlo integration is justified by the LLN.  
The empirical CDF approximates the true CDF.  
The CLT says normalized sums become approximately Normal.  
Standard errors decrease like  
1
.
n
Normal approximations apply to Binomial and Poisson distributions.  
Next lecture  
Chi-Square and Student t distributions.  
Arman Jahangiri  
Summer 2026 22